Show Me the Incentive: What Warren Buffett Still Teaches Us About Building Things That Last
- drkimberlydunwoody
- Jul 14
- 4 min read
Updated: Jul 25
When I was a student at Creighton, I got to see Warren Buffett speak in person a handful of times. He never dressed up his message. Year after year, he came back to the same warning: when corporations chase quarterly profits above everything else, the quality of their products and services suffers.
That idea stuck with me. Not because it was clever, but because it was so obviously true and so widely ignored. Most companies don't invest in their infrastructure until something breaks and forces their hand. They ship the shortcut. They defer the hard work. Then they act surprised when trust erodes and customers walk away.
Buffett saw the mechanism decades ago. The pressure to hit a number this quarter quietly reshapes every decision underneath it. And once that pressure sets in, no mission statement on the wall can undo it.
The Line Buffett's Partner Never Stopped Repeating
If Buffett named the problem, his longtime partner Charlie Munger named the cause. Munger's most famous line on the subject is short enough to fit on an index card:
"Show me the incentive and I'll show you the outcome."
That's the whole philosophy. People don't act on what you tell them to value. They act on what you actually reward. Change the incentive, and the behavior follows — every time, whether you meant it to or not.
It sounds simple. It's brutal in practice. Because it means most dysfunction isn't a people problem. It's an incentive problem wearing a people-problem costume. Teams cut corners because corner-cutting gets praised. Metrics get gamed because the metric, not the outcome, is what gets rewarded. Research gets ignored because shipping fast is what earns applause.
If you want a different outcome, you have to change what you reward. That's it. That's the work.
Why the HDOM Is Really an Incentive System
This is exactly what the Health-Driven Operating Model (HDOM) is built to do. On the surface, it looks like a way to keep product and UX organizations healthy. Underneath, it's a system for designing the right incentives — so that doing the right thing and getting rewarded point in the same direction.
Think about how product organizations actually behave. They move along a trajectory. At their best, they're aligned: goals are clear, KPIs measure real outcomes, and market and user signals shape what gets built. People understand why they're building, tradeoffs are transparent, and impact is measurable and trusted.
But most teams slide. First into drift, where goals feel abstract, metrics get tracked but rarely drive decisions, and the roadmap looks busy without going anywhere. Then into detachment, where decisions disconnect from reality entirely, KPIs become vanity metrics, and success gets declared instead of demonstrated.
Here's the Munger insight applied: teams don't drift because people are lazy or careless. They drift because the incentives quietly pull them there. When speed is rewarded over evidence, research arrives too late to matter. When politics shape the goals, KPIs bend to fit the story. When nobody rewards experience coherence, the product fragments across every touchpoint.
The HDOM fights that gravity on purpose. It ties each stage of the work to a real decision:
Frame Opportunity — Is this even worth investing in? Market POV and user insight define where to play before anyone commits resources.
Define Experience — Does this meaningfully differentiate us? Measurable outcomes and sponsor-user validation replace opinion.
Commit as Business — Are we committing real resources? Revenue model, KPIs, and roadmap get aligned out loud.
Built for Impact — Are we ready to expose this to the market? Metrics are instrumented at launch, not bolted on later.
Sense & Respond — Do we adjust, double down, or stop? Behavior, adoption, and financial signals get reviewed together.
Every one of those decision gates is an incentive. It rewards clarity over politics, behavioral evidence over aesthetics, and honest signals over comfortable stories. The framework works because it makes the healthy choice the rewarded choice. Show people that incentive, and you'll get an aligned outcome.
An Expensive, Public Lesson in Living Your Values
Which brings me to why Buffett is on my mind today.
On July 14, 2026, Reuters reported that Warren Buffett ended his two-decade philanthropic partnership with the Gates Foundation. He redirected roughly $6 billion in Berkshire Hathaway stock to four family-run charities instead. The move followed disclosures about Bill Gates' interactions with the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Buffett had already told CNBC that he and Gates hadn't spoken since the Epstein files were partially released.
Sit with the numbers for a second. Buffett had given the Gates Foundation more than $47 billion over the years. The easy, convenient path was to keep the machine running and say nothing. Instead, at 95 years old, he quietly changed course and let his actions speak.
That's a man whose stated values and revealed incentives point in the same direction. He didn't reward himself with comfort. He rewarded himself with integrity — and accepted the cost that came with it.
The Point
At a moment when plenty of corporations seem eager to ignore or minimize the Epstein tragedy, it's genuinely refreshing to watch Buffett buck that trend. He's a living example of integrity chosen over convenience.
And that's the same principle the HDOM is built around. You can't post your values on a wall and hope people follow them. You have to build systems where the right thing is also the rewarded thing. Where clarity beats politics. Where evidence beats opinion. Where doing right by the people you serve is the path that actually gets reinforced.
Munger was right. Show me the incentive, and I'll show you the outcome. Buffett just reminded us — again — what it looks like when someone gets the incentive right.
Build your organization the same way. Your products, your teams, and the people you serve will show you the difference.




